Ilhan Omar

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 96
11/2/2025, 2:01:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Joe Radinovich
@joeradinovich
·
6d
@IlhanMN @peoplepowerpod1 As much as you’d love to to be able to call someone and tell them to fire me, you can’t—and I stay working for people who deserve the public’s trust. As to the questions, anyone can read what I posted & decide for themselves if it doesn’t deserve answers from their representative
Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN
·
6d
@joeradinovich @peoplepowerpod1 This is stupid and you know it, but someone like you who has so much dirty in his closet should fuck off. There is a reason no one hires you besides those who don’t have other options. Keep planting your fake stories on me and it will continue to show your desperation.
Joe Radinovich
@joeradinovich
·
6d
@IlhanMN @peoplepowerpod1
Joe Radinovich
@joeradinovich
·
453d
I noticed Rep. Omar shared a thread yesterday that attempted to deflect questions/criticisms about her paying $3m in campaign funds to her husband’s firm and other...peculiar...business doings.🧵
Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN
·
6d
@peoplepowerpod1 Frey is also the only one who had someone in his office convicted of fraud and has a spouse who worked for the law firm defending the fraud. The only reason they keep mentioning Omar, is because he is Somali and it’s disgusting.
peoplepowerpodcast
@peoplepowerpod1
·
7d
"Swimming in fraud" is a hell of a statement from Jacob Frey's surrogates considering the mayor's "closest friend" Jonathan Weinhagen, who Frey tried to make the shadow mayor, was federally indicted last week for fraud & embezzlement with a scheme that makes mobsters envious
Joe Radinovich
@joeradinovich
·
8d
Not sure I’ve seen literally any money spent telling voters he’s too young or idealistic. Seen a fair amount spent saying he’s lied about his past positions and is swimming in fraud and ethics issues.

The statement appears sarcastic and condescending, implying that the person addressed is only capable of holding 'little jobs.' It does not engage constructively with the issues discussed in the preceding conversation and instead focuses on personal remarks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses sarcasm to belittle the individual. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It lacks respect for the dignity of others, engaging in a form of personal attack. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on personal disparagement. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for sarcasm rather than addressing the issues at hand. [-1]