Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of age and leadership within the Democratic Party, referencing an article that critiques the party's reliance on older politicians. It raises questions about the party's decision-making and the implications of having a gerontocracy.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents a critique without personal attacks, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a public issue and referencing an article for further reading, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the Democratic Party's strategy without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using a platform to discuss a public issue, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.