The statement presents historical presidential approval ratings one year from midterm elections, comparing various U.S. presidents. It provides a factual comparison of approval ratings, which can contribute to public discourse by offering data for analysis and discussion on presidential performance and public opinion.
- The statement does no harm as it presents factual data without inflammatory language. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By providing historical data, the statement can promote understanding of public opinion trends over time. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it focuses on approval ratings rather than personal attributes of the presidents. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses historical data to inform the public, which can contribute to societal understanding of political trends. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly sharing factual information. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.