Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the idea of a federal backstop for OpenAI's data center investments, comparing it to socialism and contrasting it with public services like free buses. It engages in public discourse by addressing economic policies and corporate practices.
- The statement does not use harmful language, but it does employ a critical tone to make a point about economic policy.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived inconsistency in economic policy, encouraging readers to consider the implications of corporate subsidies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of economic policy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to question corporate practices and government policies, aiming to provoke thought and discussion for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing public policy and corporate actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.