Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques OpenAI's approach to AI and financial management, suggesting that their reliance on federal support indicates a failure in creating 'natively-intelligent machines.' It implies that taxpayers will bear the financial burden. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, focusing on the perceived shortcomings of OpenAI's strategy.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by undermining trust in OpenAI without providing detailed evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as dismissive of OpenAI's efforts.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and leans towards personal attacks on OpenAI's strategy. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.