Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/10/2025, 1:12:52 AM
X
In reply to:
May Owoyele || Sound god
@MayOwoyele
·
46d
@bennpeifert @GaryMarcus @sama Claude is profitable, Gemini is profitable (I think)

Deepseek was profitable in the first month, I think

I don't think they are making a loss on inference costs

Also, GPUs are fixed assets, in the near long term
Benn Eifert 🥷🏴‍☠️
@bennpeifert
·
46d
@MayOwoyele @GaryMarcus @sama super competitive space no advantage and 100% focused on grift
Benn Eifert 🥷🏴‍☠️
@bennpeifert
·
46d
@MayOwoyele @GaryMarcus @sama mmm nope
May Owoyele || Sound god
@MayOwoyele
·
46d
@GaryMarcus @sama @bennpeifert Open AI is actually profitable. They are making a loss because they think they can build AGI.. if they slowed down, they'd be profitable

If you short it, you'd probably regret it. I'm not their biggest fan either
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
46d
dear @sama,

With due respect, and as one of your loudest critics for many years, what you say below re critics wishing they could buy shares is, like a lot of what you say, bullshit.

I will in fact be shorting OpenAI, as arranged through @bennpeifert.

👉 I do not see how you
Benn Eifert 🥷🏴‍☠️
@bennpeifert
·
53d
if you want in on this there is as much size as you want on my side of the market, just hit me up

The conversation involves a debate about the profitability and business strategies of AI companies, particularly OpenAI. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, with participants questioning each other's claims and motivations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a critical discussion about business practices.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation maintains a level of respect, though it includes strong language and criticism. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue involves disagreement but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on business strategies and profitability.