The statement comments on the perceived decline in programming skills due to AI advancements, suggesting that older engineers have superior fundamental skills compared to newer generations. It touches on public concerns about the impact of AI on skill development and workforce capabilities.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but implies a negative view of current-generation engineers, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards current-generation engineers, as it generalizes their skills negatively. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it makes a broad generalization without inviting discussion or providing evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to express an opinion on a public issue, but it could be more responsible by avoiding generalizations and promoting a more balanced view.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.