In reply to:
Whole Mars Catalog
@WholeMarsBlog
·
42d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the feasibility and progress of autonomous vehicle technology and its implications. It critiques past predictions about technological advancements, specifically regarding driverless cars and their capabilities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but critiques a prediction, which is a normal part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on technological claims rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of past predictions, which is a valid form of dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.