In reply to:
Bex Cran
@bexcran
·
42d
The conversation critiques Elon Musk's past prediction about Tesla's self-driving capabilities. It highlights the delay in achieving the promised technology, referencing a recent incident involving influencers attempting a cross-country drive with Tesla's FSD. The tone is critical and skeptical, focusing on the gap between promises and reality.
- The statement does not cause harm but highlights a technological shortcoming.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation promotes understanding by discussing the challenges of self-driving technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The critique is directed at a public figure's prediction, not a personal attack. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.