Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques OpenAI's decision-making regarding the release of their models, suggesting that the company may be unable to make the IMO model reliable or general enough for release. It engages with public discourse by addressing concerns about corporate transparency and decision-making in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of OpenAI's capabilities, which could be seen as a negative reflection on the company.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's decisions without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on OpenAI's actions, using the platform to discuss corporate responsibility in AI development. [+1]