Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
11/17/2025, 4:33:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Skryl
@ssskryl
·
35d
@GaryMarcus Bro started the first US car company in 100 years, returned launch and de-orbit capabilities to the US, created a new satellite telecom, and promised us all a robot… while armchair experts who have done nothing useful for humanity are calling him delusional? What a time to be
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
36d
funny, i thought this was about Sam but admit it applies to Elon as well.

what a time to be alive!
Natalie Wynn
@ContraPoints
·
36d
I don’t understand why people continue investing in a company whose CEO is self-evidently delusional and whose plans for the business have no basis in reality. Are they stupid?

The statement criticizes a public figure for not fulfilling promises and suggests the other person should be more informed before speaking. It has a confrontational tone and implies a lack of credibility.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful due to its confrontational nature, potentially discouraging open dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It lacks respect and could be perceived as dismissive, bordering on personal attack. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a dismissive tone. [-1]