In reply to:
Alex Skryl
@ssskryl
·
35d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
35d
Alex Skryl
@ssskryl
·
35d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
36d
The statement critiques a public figure's track record, suggesting a more nuanced evaluation of achievements versus promises. It engages in a debate about the credibility and accomplishments of a well-known entrepreneur.
- The statement aims to provide a balanced view, which aligns with striving to do no harm by encouraging a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or disrespectful language, thus respecting the dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on the factual basis of the entrepreneur's achievements and promises. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.