Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
11/17/2025, 7:41:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Emmanuel
@EMaggiori_
·
35d
@GaryMarcus There isn’t such thing as a “technical moat.” Technology never builds a moat by itself (people can copy it). There needs to be a “business moat” such as high switching costs that lock customers in. Successful technology companies aren’t successful because of their technology.

The statement is a response in a conversation about the concept of 'technical moats' in technology companies. It challenges the original assertion by suggesting that research, such as the linked article, provides evidence of patents creating significant business advantages. The tone is direct and somewhat dismissive, urging the original poster to conduct research.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone ('dude. do some research.') could be perceived as disrespectful, which slightly violates the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by providing a counterpoint and a resource for further reading, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism. However, the use of 'dude' and the imperative tone could be seen as a minor personal attack, slightly detracting from constructive engagement.