In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
31d
The statement and linked content discuss a significant public issue regarding the regulation of AI and the balance of power between federal and state governments. The tone is urgent and critical, suggesting that the White House's actions could undermine state rights and legislative processes.
- The statement aims to raise awareness about potential governmental overreach, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for state rights. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the implications of federal actions on state rights. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the White House's approach, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant policy issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.