Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 83

-2

@Graffitinights1 100 (99?) Senators voted against the last version of this nonsense. Republican Marsha Blackburn led them. Do your homework.

Random states have the right regulate a lot of things, from education to roads. There is no fed regulation. Feds are not doing their job.

11/19/2025, 11:55:40 PM

In reply to:

Graffitinights

@Graffitinights1

31d

@GaryMarcus Under what basis should random states have the right to regulate AI? All AI is inherently interstate commerce. And it's a national security issue vis a vis China on top of that.

There's no logical basis for this take other than realpolitik in that Dems don't control Congress.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

31d

Urgent: The White House is attempting to circumvent Congress and crush the rights of individual states to regulate AI. Visit the links below.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the regulation of AI, a significant public policy issue. It critiques the federal government's role and the rights of states in regulating AI, referencing a political figure and legislative actions.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language ('nonsense') but does not directly harm individuals, focusing instead on policy critique.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects privacy and dignity, avoiding personal attacks, though it could be more respectful in tone. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of government actions and policies, but it lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as dismissive. [-1]