Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/22/2025, 7:59:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Fhotek
@Fhotec
·
10d
@GaryMarcus @dwarkesh_sp I assume he has never asked you to go on.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
10d
It is now very possible that overhype and overleverage around LLMs will lead to an economic collapse.

Imagine where the world would be now if prominent podcasters like @dwarkesh_sp had allowed me to give a rebuttal to reports like this one, rather than pouring fuel on a false
Dwarkesh Patel
@dwarkesh_sp
·
241d
If an AI lab is kicking off an intelligence explosion, would it be in their interest to tell the President or not?

@slatestarcodex and @DKokotajlo think yes.

"We made the guess that early in 2027, the [leading AI] company would deliberately wake up the president.

The statement 'nope' is a brief and dismissive response in a conversation about the potential economic impact of AI and the role of public discourse in addressing it. The original discussion involves concerns about AI overhype and the need for balanced dialogue. The reply does not contribute substantively to the discussion or address the issues raised.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not actively cause harm, but it also does not contribute positively to the discussion.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy or understanding, as it dismisses the previous points without engagement. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply negates the previous comment without explanation. [-1]