Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/22/2025, 8:01:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Liron Shapira
@liron
·
10d
@GaryMarcus @dwarkesh_sp Would love to host a doom debate sometime with you vs. one of the AI 2027 authors, or vs any respectable predictors with different timelines.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
10d
It is now very possible that overhype and overleverage around LLMs will lead to an economic collapse.

Imagine where the world would be now if prominent podcasters like @dwarkesh_sp had allowed me to give a rebuttal to reports like this one, rather than pouring fuel on a false
Dwarkesh Patel
@dwarkesh_sp
·
241d
If an AI lab is kicking off an intelligence explosion, would it be in their interest to tell the President or not?

@slatestarcodex and @DKokotajlo think yes.

"We made the guess that early in 2027, the [leading AI] company would deliberately wake up the president.

The statement is part of a discussion on AI predictions and potential economic impacts, which constitutes public discourse. It suggests a willingness to engage in further debate on the topic, indicating an openness to dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and shows a willingness to engage in further discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by expressing interest in continuing the conversation. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites constructive dialogue by suggesting a debate. [+1]