Gary Marcus

The statement critiques the lack of follow-through on promises related to a national AI framework, suggesting a gap between rhetoric and action. It uses a sarcastic tone to highlight perceived inaction or hypocrisy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to hold a group accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by encouraging transparency and action. However, the sarcastic tone may undermine constructive dialogue.
2. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does so with sarcasm, which may not foster constructive dialogue or understanding. [-1]