In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the capabilities and implications of current and future AI technologies. It acknowledges both positive and negative aspects, focusing on issues like reasoning, reliability, and hallucination in current AI models. The statement suggests that future AI might be more effective if it incorporates LLMs as components rather than the main focus.
- The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging both the positive and negative aspects of AI, promoting a balanced view. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by discussing specific issues with current AI and suggesting a potential path for future development. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to another user's concerns and adding depth to the discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.