Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the capabilities and implications of current and future AI technologies. It acknowledges both positive and negative aspects, emphasizing concerns about reasoning, reliability, and hallucination in current AI models. The statement suggests that future AI, potentially less focused on large language models, may offer improvements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging both positive and negative aspects of AI, promoting a balanced view. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by discussing specific issues like reasoning and reliability, contributing to a nuanced conversation about AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to another user's perspective and expanding on the discussion. [+1]