Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/25/2025, 4:17:56 PM
X
In reply to:
atomirex
@atomirex
·
5d
@GaryMarcus @JOEBOTxyz If this is the case why is the doom industry so hyperactive? Have we shifted from “AI is going to destroy society” to “AI companies want all our money” and expecting no one will notice?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
5d
👉 The bubble has begun to deflate.

👉 The jockeying for bailouts has begun.

👉 The government has begun to capitulate.

👉 GenAI was never reliable enough to make economic sense.

👉 All that talk about AGI 2027 was bullshit.

👉 Now the taxpayers are going to be left to clean
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
328d
The countdown until we are told that LLMs are “too big to fail” starts now.

“We can’t afford to lose to China”, they will say, accepting their multibillion dollar bailouts.

The statement engages in a discussion about the societal impact of large language models (LLMs) and their alignment issues, which is a public concern. The tone is critical and skeptical, focusing on the potential risks and misconceptions surrounding AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but raises concerns about societal risks, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the risks of LLMs, though it could be more empathetic in its approach. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs and the perception of their intelligence, without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to responsibly discuss the implications of AI on society, maintaining integrity in its critique. [+2]