Gary Marcus

The statement critiques the use of taxpayer money to support companies like OpenAI and Nvidia, suggesting it diverts resources from achieving beneficial technological advancements. It engages in public discourse by addressing the allocation of public funds and the development of AI technologies.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of current funding practices, suggesting a need for better resource allocation.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding by highlighting concerns about resource allocation and its impact on technological progress. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the use of taxpayer money, though it could be more specific in suggesting alternatives. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses influence to question and potentially improve public policy regarding AI funding. [+1]