Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/26/2025, 2:18:53 AM
X
In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
4d
@GaryMarcus Ilya *expects* the current methods to hit the wall at some point based on his priors, not the same as “evidence of hitting the wall”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
4d
translation : Deep Learning Hit a Wall™

new techniques needed to go forward; just like my infamous 2022 paper said.

go back and read it!
Jen Zhu
@jenzhuscott
·
4d
"We are no longer in the age of scaling, we are back to the age of research.'

Kaplan scaling laws are flattening at current frontiers, autoregressive transformers exhausted for reasoning/planning/alignment gains. Next jump needs real architectural breakthroughs - test-time

The statement is part of a public discourse on the limitations and future of deep learning, engaging in a debate about the current state and future direction of AI research. The tone is dismissive, indicating frustration with perceived pedantry.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the other party's input, which could stifle constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the other party, as it labels them a 'hair splitter,' which could be seen as dismissive or disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead resorts to a personal remark, which could hinder productive dialogue. [-1]