Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques the US government's investment in scaling up LLMs despite expert opinions suggesting it won't lead to AGI. It questions the effectiveness of such investments and implies a potential misalignment between expert insights and government actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about potential misallocation of resources.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting a discrepancy between expert opinions and government actions. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policy without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses the platform to question and potentially influence public policy for societal betterment. [+1]