The statement critiques the growth of non-teaching staff in education, suggesting it hinders success. It uses data to support the argument, engaging in public discourse about education policy and resource allocation.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm but implies inefficiency, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement lacks empathy or understanding for the reasons behind staffing increases, focusing instead on criticism.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions.
[-1]