Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -111
12/3/2025, 12:08:05 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
The State Department, White House, CIA, and ODNI had two opportunities, first on November 26 and second on December 1, to deny my reporting, which I described in advance and in detail. They chose not to and still have not.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
My article gives significant room to three UAP skeptics and their legitimate objections and concerns.

Public is proud to be independent and subscriber-based. We give away some of our content for free and some we paywall. Please subscribe to support us and to read the full
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
Any true skeptic of this issue should want significantly more government transparency and disclosure on UAP. Anyone arguing against greater transparency and disclosure is telling you that they want to continue the cover-up.

If you belive that this is all a dangerous delusion and
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
Since May of this year, Marco Rubio has served in a dual role as President Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. The National Security Advisor is the President’s principal in-house advisor on all national security matters, chairs the National Security
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
Marco Rubio is the most powerful Secretary of State since Kissinger. As such, it is significant that he believes the US has recovered alien tech and given it to private military contractors. A senior Rubio advisor says, “We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing government transparency and UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) disclosure. The tone is skeptical and critical, aiming to highlight a lack of transparency and potential cover-ups by government entities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on transparency and accountability rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging skepticism and inquiry into government actions. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning government transparency and encouraging dialogue on UAP issues. [+1]