Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -111
12/3/2025, 12:08:50 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
😂
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
The State Department, White House, CIA, and ODNI had two opportunities, first on November 26 and second on December 1, to deny my reporting, which I described in advance and in detail. They chose not to and still have not.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
My article gives significant room to three UAP skeptics and their legitimate objections and concerns.

Public is proud to be independent and subscriber-based. We give away some of our content for free and some we paywall. Please subscribe to support us and to read the full
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
Any true skeptic of this issue should want significantly more government transparency and disclosure on UAP. Anyone arguing against greater transparency and disclosure is telling you that they want to continue the cover-up.

If you belive that this is all a dangerous delusion and
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
Since May of this year, Marco Rubio has served in a dual role as President Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. The National Security Advisor is the President’s principal in-house advisor on all national security matters, chairs the National Security
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
19d
Marco Rubio is the most powerful Secretary of State since Kissinger. As such, it is significant that he believes the US has recovered alien tech and given it to private military contractors. A senior Rubio advisor says, “We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing government transparency and disclosure regarding UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and alleged crash-retrieval programs. The conversation involves public figures and government agencies, touching on issues of national security and public accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about government transparency, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for public awareness. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and government actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging dialogue about government transparency and accountability. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning government actions and advocating for more transparency without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]