Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to international relations, the NATO Treaty, and the actions of the EU Commission, which are significant public concerns. The tone is urgent and accusatory, suggesting that the EU's actions are endangering security and violating democratic principles. The intent is to criticize the EU's approach to content moderation and transparency, and to take action by warning EU lawmakers.
- The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as potentially harmful, but it does not directly incite harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses the EU of censorship and authoritarianism, which could be seen as disrespectful, but it does not engage in hate speech or harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and confrontational. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses strong accusations, which could be seen as a form of personal attack against the EU Commission. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by criticizing the EU, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform are questionable due to the accusatory tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.