Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
The statement criticizes Henna Virkkunen for allegedly spreading disinformation and demanding censorship, framing it as an attack on free speech and democracy. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, suggesting a strong disagreement with the actions taken under the DSA.
- The statement's confrontational tone may not align with striving to do no harm, as it could escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses someone of spreading disinformation and demanding censorship without providing evidence, which may not respect the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the opposing viewpoint without engaging constructively. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting instead for personal attacks and dismissive language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.