+4
In reply to:
Spencer Andrews
@TruthIsLiberty4
·
13d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
The statement by @TruthIsLiberty4 addresses a public issue related to drug smuggling and the origins of fentanyl, engaging in a debate about the causes of the drug problem in America. The tone is corrective, aiming to clarify a misconception about the source of fentanyl.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to correct misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By attempting to clarify a misconception, the statement promotes understanding, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a factual correction without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.