In reply to:
🔥Temporary Solutions💉
@TSBurkhardt
·
13d
Right Angle News Network
@Rightanglenews
·
13d
The statement and conversation involve a serious public issue regarding allegations of corruption within the DEA. The tone is somewhat sensational and includes a suggestion to mock the situation, which may not promote constructive dialogue.
- The suggestion to mock the situation could be seen as harmful, as it trivializes a serious issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation respects privacy but could be seen as disrespectful to those involved by suggesting mockery. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The tone does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on ridicule. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and leans towards personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.