-5
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to censorship, transparency, and accountability of social media platforms, specifically in the context of compliance with regulatory obligations. The tone is accusatory and critical, focusing on the actions of both the social media platform and the regulatory body.
- The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful, potentially impacting the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead focuses on accusations, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, given the accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.