Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -109
Christopher Landau
@DeputySecState
·
10d
What’s even worse is that the US is in a MILITARY ALLIANCE with the very countries attacking us via the EU. As @VP @JDVance noted earlier this year, this contradiction cannot continue. The nations of Europe cannot look to the US for their own security at the same time they
12/6/2025, 1:44:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
President Trump's National Security strategy, released today, says, "It is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies."

Today's fine on X supports that conclusion.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-co…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
Most of the politicians and news media in Europe have been lying to their citizens for decades. They've said American commitment to Europe is unconditional and permanent. It's not. We have our limits. Europeans might pay attention to this:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
Europe is in direct violation of the NATO Treaty. Americans signed up to protect free democracies, not authoritarian censorship states. I will travel to Europe next week to directly warn EU lawmakers that the @EU_Commission is putting their security and lives in danger. 🚨🚨🚨
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
You say it's not about censorship ("content moderation") but it is. You want to censor who gets verified. And you want X to give government-picked "researchers" special access to data so they can demand censorship. The Twitter Files revealed your censorship-by-proxy scam.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing international relations, specifically the dynamics between the U.S. and European countries within the context of national security and economic strength. It critiques European countries' ability to remain reliable allies, referencing economic and military concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by suggesting European countries are unreliable, which might strain diplomatic relations. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but could be seen as disrespectful to European nations by questioning their reliability. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on highlighting perceived failures. [-1]