In reply to:
Desiree Fixler
@desireefixler
·
10d
The statement by @desireefixler addresses concerns about censorship and bias in European enforcement, suggesting that platforms like LinkedIn are protected while others are punished. This engages with public issues related to free speech and regulatory fairness.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by biased enforcement, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by highlighting perceived inconsistencies in enforcement, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of EU policies without personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses the platform to address societal issues, aiming to influence public opinion and policy. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.