Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47

Score -109

-8

US censorship activists are actively working with the EU and other foreign governments to censor their fellow Americans. Here’s the proof:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

49d

In 2022, Obama gave a speech at Stanford Cyber Policy Center advocating sweeping censorship of the Internet. Now, Public has discovered the same Center last month hosted a secret meeting with EU, UK, Brazil, & Australia officials to plot global censorship — including of the US.

12/7/2025, 4:15:24 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

The EU won’t be satisfied until it can censor American political candidates

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

522d

Take a good look at this man. His intent is to censor the entire Internet, including in the United States. He hates our freedom because it exposes his lies. He treats “1984” as a guidebook. He is a totalitarian menace, and we must do everything we can to remove him from power.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

Imagine if the US and EU were still aligned on the censorship-by-proxy strategy. Few people realize how close we were to global totalitarianism.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

437d

Bill Gates two weeks ago, John Kerry last week, and Hillary Clinton today — all demanding government censorship of X. Hard to see this as a coincidence. They appear to be laying the groundwork for totalitarianism. Our democratic republic is in danger.

The statement and its context suggest a strong opposition to perceived censorship efforts by US and EU entities, framing them as a threat to free speech and democracy. The tone is alarmist and accusatory, suggesting a coordinated effort to suppress freedom of expression.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement may incite fear and distrust, potentially causing harm by spreading alarmist views without substantiated evidence. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement accuses specific individuals and groups of malicious intent, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and suspicion. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against public figures, rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]