Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -109
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
448d
Gates, Soros, Biden, Harris, Walz, Clinton, Obama, the legacy media, the FBI, CIA, DHS, the EU, Brazil, and the Five Eyes nations are desperate to censor the Internet. They're not hiding it. Look at them: they're trying to normalize it. This is an exceedingly dangerous moment.
12/7/2025, 4:17:13 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
US censorship activists are actively working with the EU and other foreign governments to censor their fellow Americans. Here’s the proof:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
49d
In 2022, Obama gave a speech at Stanford Cyber Policy Center advocating sweeping censorship of the Internet. Now, Public has discovered the same Center last month hosted a secret meeting with EU, UK, Brazil, & Australia officials to plot global censorship — including of the US.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
The EU won’t be satisfied until it can censor American political candidates
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
522d
Take a good look at this man. His intent is to censor the entire Internet, including in the United States. He hates our freedom because it exposes his lies. He treats “1984” as a guidebook. He is a totalitarian menace, and we must do everything we can to remove him from power.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
Imagine if the US and EU were still aligned on the censorship-by-proxy strategy. Few people realize how close we were to global totalitarianism.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
437d
Bill Gates two weeks ago, John Kerry last week, and Hillary Clinton today — all demanding government censorship of X. Hard to see this as a coincidence. They appear to be laying the groundwork for totalitarianism. Our democratic republic is in danger.

The statement 'The price of freedom is constant vigilance' is a response to a discussion about censorship and perceived threats to free speech. It emphasizes the need for ongoing awareness and action to protect freedoms, particularly in the context of government and elite actions. The tone is cautionary and calls for active engagement in safeguarding democratic values.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for vigilance in protecting freedom, which is a positive societal value. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and awareness about the importance of vigilance in maintaining freedom, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on the need for vigilance rather than attacking individuals, adhering to the principle of avoiding personal attacks. [+1]