Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement by @sunnyright critiques European free speech policies, suggesting that Europeans claim to have complete free speech but label certain expressions as hate speech, which the author implies is a contradiction. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, suggesting a cultural decline in Europe.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but uses a critical tone that could be perceived as dismissive or disrespectful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it generalizes about Europeans in a way that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism but rather makes a sweeping generalization without engaging with specific arguments or evidence. [-2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not fully uphold the responsibility and integrity expected in public discourse. [-1]