Michael Schellenberger

The statement criticizes the EU's approach to media and censorship, suggesting it leads to a 'digital totalitarian system.' It implies that the EU is suppressing dissent and promoting government-approved narratives. The tone is accusatory and suggests a significant concern about freedom of speech and media manipulation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as harmful by potentially spreading fear or misinformation about the EU's intentions, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the privacy and dignity of those involved by accusing them of creating a totalitarian system, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging in a balanced discussion. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather makes a strong accusation without providing evidence or engaging in dialogue. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the EU's policies, which could be seen as using influence for societal debate, but it lacks responsibility and integrity in its approach. [-1]