Michael Schellenberger

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of censorship, media influence, and political power within the EU. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that certain EU leaders are implementing totalitarian policies that threaten European security.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, labeling policies as 'totalitarian' without providing detailed evidence. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it accuses them of threatening security without substantiated claims. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, calling out specific leaders without a balanced discussion. [-2]