Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -94
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
9d
@vonderleyen I will be speaking on December 17 to the EU parliament about the clear and present danger to the EU and the West by the totalitarian policies of @vonderleyen. She and her bosses, @EmmanuelMacron & @_FriedrichMerz , are threatening the security of Europe.
12/10/2025, 2:03:39 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
9d
America鈥檚 relationship with Europe could change faster than people realize.
Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
路
9d
NATO is a Cold War relic. The United States should withdraw from NATO and use that money to defend our country, not socialist countries.

Today, I introduced HR 6508 to end our NATO membership.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
13d
Europe is in direct violation of the NATO Treaty. Americans signed up to protect free democracies, not authoritarian censorship states. I will travel to Europe next week to directly warn EU lawmakers that the @EU_Commission is putting their security and lives in danger. 馃毃馃毃馃毃
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
13d
You say it's not about censorship ("content moderation") but it is. You want to censor who gets verified. And you want X to give government-picked "researchers" special access to data so they can demand censorship. The Twitter Files revealed your censorship-by-proxy scam.

The statement and its context involve a complex discussion about international relations, censorship, and the role of NATO, touching on significant public issues. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on alleged censorship and political dynamics between the U.S., Europe, and social media platforms.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight perceived threats and issues, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness, but the accusatory tone may contribute to polarization.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses specific individuals and entities of totalitarian practices, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful to their dignity.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding of the issues it raises, but the confrontational tone may hinder empathy and compassion.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of policies and actions, but the personal attacks and strong language may detract from constructive dialogue.聽[-1]