Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -94
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
🚨TWITTER FILES – FRANCE

At this moment, the Trump administration is negotiating with the EU over final obstacles to a trade deal, one of which is European censorship of US social media platforms.

Many analysts believe the massive size of the EU will lead US social media firms
12/16/2025, 2:53:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
The EU is determined to censor X worldwide.

Tomorrow I will warn members of the EU Parliament of the

— threat to Western civilization

— plot by @EU_Commission @EmmanuelMacron Australia @eSafetyOffice Brazil @STF_oficial

— roles played by CIA, DHS & Stanford

LFG!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
@vonderleyen I will be speaking on December 17 to the EU parliament about the clear and present danger to the EU and the West by the totalitarian policies of @vonderleyen. She and her bosses, @EmmanuelMacron & @_FriedrichMerz , are threatening the security of Europe.

The statement and its context involve a discussion on censorship, government influence, and media freedom, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a threat to Western civilization by various governments and organizations. The intent appears to be to raise awareness and warn against perceived censorship and control by authorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as alarmist, potentially causing harm by inciting fear or distrust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It accuses specific individuals and organizations of totalitarian behavior, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of perceived threats to freedom, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather makes strong accusations, which could hinder productive discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on censorship and government control, aligning with this principle. [+1]