Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -89
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
52d
In 2022, Obama gave a speech at Stanford Cyber Policy Center advocating sweeping censorship of the Internet. Now, Public has discovered the same Center last month hosted a secret meeting with EU, UK, Brazil, & Australia officials to plot global censorship — including of the US.
12/16/2025, 2:56:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
We will cover:

Twitter Files France
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
🚨TWITTER FILES – FRANCE

At this moment, the Trump administration is negotiating with the EU over final obstacles to a trade deal, one of which is European censorship of US social media platforms.

Many analysts believe the massive size of the EU will lead US social media firms
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
The EU is determined to censor X worldwide.

Tomorrow I will warn members of the EU Parliament of the

— threat to Western civilization

— plot by @EU_Commission @EmmanuelMacron Australia @eSafetyOffice Brazil @STF_oficial

— roles played by CIA, DHS & Stanford

LFG!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
@vonderleyen I will be speaking on December 17 to the EU parliament about the clear and present danger to the EU and the West by the totalitarian policies of @vonderleyen. She and her bosses, @EmmanuelMacron & @_FriedrichMerz , are threatening the security of Europe.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about censorship and the role of various organizations and governments in influencing information control. It implies a threat from the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, suggesting a coordinated effort to impose censorship. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy, which may not promote understanding or constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by spreading fear or misinformation about the intentions of the Stanford Cyber Policy Center. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals associated with the center, potentially engaging in harassment. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The accusatory tone does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack on the center and its leadership. [-1]