Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -89
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
865d
The White House didn’t violate the First Amendment when it demanded more censorship by Facebook, many say. But newly released emails show Facebook execs felt pressure to comply with White House demands in order to save its $1.2B/year advertising business in the European Union.
12/16/2025, 3:00:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
@McFaul Twitter Files - CIA
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
575d
TWITTER FILES - CIA

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is the most famous of the 18 US government agencies that comprise the Intelligence Community (IC) of the United States of America. Unlike the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), the law strictly prohibits CIA
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
@McFaul Censorship led by DHS:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
773d
The idea that US officials worked to censor ordinary Americans is a debunked conspiracy theory, say the mainstream media. But it's not. And now, newly released documents reveal a conspiracy not just to violate the First Amendment but also to interfere with the 2020 elections.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
Continuing threat posed by the Stanford Cyber Policy Center led by former Ambassador to Russia for Obama, Michael @McFaul
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
52d
In 2022, Obama gave a speech at Stanford Cyber Policy Center advocating sweeping censorship of the Internet. Now, Public has discovered the same Center last month hosted a secret meeting with EU, UK, Brazil, & Australia officials to plot global censorship — including of the US.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
We will cover:

Twitter Files France
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
🚨TWITTER FILES – FRANCE

At this moment, the Trump administration is negotiating with the EU over final obstacles to a trade deal, one of which is European censorship of US social media platforms.

Many analysts believe the massive size of the EU will lead US social media firms
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
The EU is determined to censor X worldwide.

Tomorrow I will warn members of the EU Parliament of the

— threat to Western civilization

— plot by @EU_Commission @EmmanuelMacron Australia @eSafetyOffice Brazil @STF_oficial

— roles played by CIA, DHS & Stanford

LFG!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
@vonderleyen I will be speaking on December 17 to the EU parliament about the clear and present danger to the EU and the West by the totalitarian policies of @vonderleyen. She and her bosses, @EmmanuelMacron & @_FriedrichMerz , are threatening the security of Europe.

The statement and its context involve allegations of censorship and government influence over social media platforms, which are significant public issues. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy involving major institutions and governments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, which may incite distrust. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the privacy and dignity of individuals and organizations by making serious allegations without clear evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, particularly against public figures and institutions. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]