Michael Schellenberger

The statement and its context involve allegations of censorship by the EU and other entities, touching on issues of free speech and governmental influence over social media platforms. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy to suppress information.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, which may incite distrust. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of those accused without substantial evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive dialogue, opting for a confrontational approach. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The influence is used to raise awareness of perceived threats to free speech, but the approach may not be responsible.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by discussing censorship but may lack integrity if the claims are unsubstantiated.