Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the relationship between the European Union and U.S. service providers, focusing on legal and regulatory actions that are perceived as discriminatory. The tone is critical and suggests a conflict between the EU and U.S. companies, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies harm through the actions of the EU, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize the actions of the EU.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but rather critiques the actions of an entity, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing public policies and actions, which is a responsible use of a platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.