Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -102
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d

The statement is part of a broader discussion on alleged censorship and international political dynamics. It implies skepticism and criticism towards EU leaders and their actions regarding censorship. The tone is critical and suggests a conspiracy involving global leaders.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about censorship and international conspiracies. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it implies wrongdoing without clear evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations and conspiracy theories. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it lacks evidence and relies on insinuations. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but may not do so responsibly, given the lack of substantiated evidence. [-2]