Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -102
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
4d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
5d

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses significant public issues related to government interference, censorship, and election integrity. The tone is accusatory and suggests a pattern of disinformation and censorship by the Intelligence Community (IC).

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about government actions, which may undermine public trust.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the privacy and dignity of the individuals and organizations mentioned by implying misconduct without providing evidence.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging in a balanced discussion.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it makes strong accusations without offering a platform for dialogue or rebuttal.聽[-2]