Michael Schellenberger

The statement and its context involve a discussion on government interference, censorship, and the role of intelligence communities, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and suggests a pattern of disinformation and censorship by authorities.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by government actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the actions of public figures and institutions, which could be seen as respecting privacy and dignity, but the accusatory tone may border on disrespect. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding of alleged government overreach, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which is constructive, but the tone could be perceived as confrontational.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to address significant societal issues, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]