Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -111
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
657d
THE WPATH FILES

Advocates of gender-affirming care say it’s evidence-based.

But now, newly released internal files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical.

American
12/18/2025, 1:00:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
For years, the media celebrated parents who said their children were “born into the wrong bodies” and thus required puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries to match them to their “innate gender identity.” The assumption by journalists was that children could give informed
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
The UK government has approved an experiment to block the puberty of 100+ children to see if it makes them feel better. It won't. A 2015 - 2017 study already found that. And it's unethical to experiment on children, who cannot provide informed consent.

Keira Bell @KBtheYoungOG

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the ethical and scientific considerations of gender-affirming care for children. The tone is critical, questioning the validity and ethics of medical practices related to transgender health. The intent appears to be to challenge the current medical consensus and practices regarding puberty blockers and gender-affirming care.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm to children, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, it could be seen as harmful if it spreads misinformation or fear. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement questions the privacy and dignity of those involved in gender-affirming care, potentially violating this principle if it leads to stigmatization or harassment. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards transgender individuals, focusing instead on criticism of medical practices. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of medical practices but does not engage in dialogue with those who support these practices, potentially leading to polarization. [-1]