Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -111
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
·
4d
🚨Exciting news!! My Protect Children’s Innocence Act just PASSED the House!!!

This is a win for children all over America!!

Thank you to the 3 Democrats that voted to protect kids: Rep. Cueller, Davis (NC), & Gonzalez!

Unfortunately, 4 Republicans decided NOT to vote to
12/18/2025, 1:10:11 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
WPATH FILES
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
657d
THE WPATH FILES

Advocates of gender-affirming care say it’s evidence-based.

But now, newly released internal files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical.

American
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
For years, the media celebrated parents who said their children were “born into the wrong bodies” and thus required puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries to match them to their “innate gender identity.” The assumption by journalists was that children could give informed
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
The UK government has approved an experiment to block the puberty of 100+ children to see if it makes them feel better. It won't. A 2015 - 2017 study already found that. And it's unethical to experiment on children, who cannot provide informed consent.

Keira Bell @KBtheYoungOG

The statement is congratulatory and supportive of a legislative action, framing it as a significant human rights issue. It emphasizes transparency regarding representatives' positions on the matter.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing due to the contentious nature of the topic.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be interpreted as indirectly contributing to a divisive discourse. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a specific viewpoint rather than understanding or empathy for differing perspectives. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but lacks constructive dialogue with opposing views.